A practical reading of the search term "big knife": which stated measurements actually describe size, why a name is not a measurement, and how to compare listings without guessing.
How to compare two listings for size
Put the same kind of measurement next to the same kind of measurement. A total length against a total length is a fair comparison; a total length against a folded length is not, because they describe different states of the item. If one listing gives only an overall length and another gives only a folded size, the supplied facts do not support a like-for-like size comparison, and the honest answer is that the two cannot be ranked from those figures alone.
Weight is a separate line for the same reason. A stated net weight tells you what the listing says the item weighs; it does not tell you why one knife weighs more than another, and it should not be read as a statement about balance or how the knife carries.
If size is the deciding factor, write down the specific figure you need, in the unit you think in, and check that each shortlisted listing states that same figure. Where a listing is silent, treat the point as open and ask the seller. A name that includes big is not a substitute for that check.
Does the E119 name mean it is a large knife?
The name includes the word Big, but a name is not a measurement. The listing states a total length of 16.8 cm, a blade length of 6.8 cm and a handle length of 9.9 cm. Compare those figures with the figures on another listing rather than with the name.
Do the stated lengths on the E119 listing add up?
The stated blade length of 6.8 cm plus the stated handle length of 9.9 cm equals 16.7 cm, against a stated total length of 16.8 cm. The 1 mm difference is not explained by the listing, so the figures are close but not identical.
Does the listing say whether the blade can be replaced?
No. The listing does not describe blade or mechanism serviceability, so this is a question for the seller rather than something to infer from the folding format.
